(10k) Alabama introduced an almost absolute ban on abortion

When selfish powerful people are in power, people will suffer. We're walking backwards in time, at least for now.

Yes, contraceptives should be promoted as the first solution against pregnancy so the numbers of abortions can be as low as possible. But, rape, serious illness of unborn baby or the pregnant mother and in some cases even unwanted pregnancy may all justify abortion. And now in Alabama, the opponents of abortion introduced a very effective ban: 99 years imprisonment if doctors act and thus few may do, even when an abortion may be the only way to save a woman's life. Only 25 persons, all white men, introduced this ban. On the radio I heard a black man saying that now children, his daughter, who are raped will have to look at a child they didn't want and that will remind them about the horror that happened and this why the child exists. These white guys are discrediting many things we have today because white people introduced them such as the right for abortion when this is needed but also sex education with information about contraception and accepting who you are, whether straight, gay, transgender,... . But, it proofs each society has its fools, whether amongst black people as white supremacists will say, or amongst white people as these politicians and people who vote for them proof.



Because, don't forget, these people who are against abortion are often the same who are against contraceptives. They already managed to reduce finance for birth control programs in developing countries but afterwards complain too many migrants are coming. 樂. Often they are also those in favour of weapons on the streets, against many drugs, certainly drugs that help people with mental problems while many of these people don't mind to terminate people with mental problems when they do something wrong while they don't want to invest a single cent on their treatment. Yes, they are proof each society has its fools.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

(18l) Belgium, king Leopold II and Congo

Image
Leopold II in Congo Belgium has a terrible human rights track record because of its second king Leopold II (1835 - 1909) during whose reign millions of people in Congo died. People may say he is not personally responsible but the same can be said of Hitler. However, Leopold II could have ruled only Belgium but this he considered too small and thus he lobbied to gain Congo for himself and succeeded on the condition he would treat its people correct, something he refused to do from day one. Therefore, he is responsible as he actively searched for this expansion to enrich himself so he could enlarge his own glory in his kingdom Belgium with neglect of his "subjects" in Congo. And people in those days had already a conscience because the king had to replace the first ambassador who refused to collaborate to expand the king's personal property.   To have an impression of the terror Leopold ii allowed in Congo is a picture in this article that shows a black father who l...
Read more

(05d) PM Merkel is against Eurobonds - I agree to some extend

I'm having again Internet after almost a three months break. Finally, back to the world. Many European politicians (and certainly economists) want to introduce Eurobonds and as I understand it, the EU may take some (most, all?) of the debts of poorer European countries and spread it over Europe so that both strong and weak shoulders will carry the problems. Of course, it is only understandable that Europe wants to help countries that are in need (as it should do because they are members). But, as the German PM Angela Merkel (a woman who thinks differently than most men and wants other solutions then the usual ones), I am against spreading debts because it will weaken every country that take some of the debts (it is similar to banks using savings of people to pay off their debts so that when people want their money the banks can't give it anymore (I wonder whether rating agencies threat some countries well so those countries are prepared to take responsibilities to save count...
Read more

Buildup of Tensions in Societies Throughout the World

Image
We notice worldwide tensions are growing within societies. This is mainly as a result of growing inequality but also other factors are involved such as a virus and climate change that destroys crops so people start to migrate as essentials become rarer and thus more expensive compared with what people earn. The result is likely that increasingly people in places where the migrants move to will demand a closing of their borders. Let's discuss. Financial crisis 2008-2009 While inequality was growing as a result of what many people earned versus rising costs of products, this accelerated when the financial crisis was organised just over ten years ago. As a result, people lost work and many even their home such as in the USA so poverty increased although the rich became richer. But, while house prices dropped because many flats and houses became available, those with money were able to buy them cheaper and sell or rent them out to make money when property prices rose again. The problem...
Read more