(17f) Gun lobby sinks deep after last school schooting
How low can you sink
as a human when those who sell guns ridicule the victims of a shooting massacre
at a school? And it's not only the weapon lobby, also certain politicians call
opponents who want stricter gun laws "leftists
who create the crisis" and thus are America's bad side. Still, I also
believe many are really convinced that the solution in a country packed with
weapons are "more guns but for the good guys" to stop more massacres.
Also President
Trump stunt allies as he seemed to agree that stricter gun laws are
necessary and thus had a topic to unite with the Democrats although this
creates opposition
by majority of his own parties (and thus, whoever is in power has either
extreme followers and extreme opponents). Still, later he
seemed to have changed his mind after he discussed the issue with the
weapon lobby.
Another group of
politicians are the opportunists, those who think they can win elections by
being supportive of the second amendment of the Constitution to carry weapons.
However, if they notice a majority is opposed to the current gun laws, they
will change opinion to get elected and thus this group is important as they can
shift the balance in favour of stricter gun laws. Therefore, it is very
important that those who favour stricter gun laws share massively via social
and other media that they want changes to the laws and thus reduce the number
of guns and thereby the possibility to kill; after the latest shooting, growing
numbers of people are starting to support more gun control. Also youngers
from parents who support the gun lobby's position should be more assertive
towards their parents, if needed by no longer visiting their family. Indeed,
when few weapons are available, fewer people can use them to kill.
Still, the
supporters of the current gun laws probably will not accept stricter laws
without a fight against, what they consider to be enemies of the USA, the
so-called "left", and to protect the second amendment of the
Constitution as this seems to guarantee the freedom to carry guns. However,
this is not an individual freedom such as men who decide to have long hair or
people having tattoos. Because, the first "freedom" can harm others
while having long hair or having tattoos doesn't harm anyone; still, many of
the supporters of the current gun laws are those who condemn men with long
hair, even when women are proof that long hair doesn't make you stupid, neither
do tattoos. And thus, although they say guns are needed to protect society
against dictatorship, those supporting even more weapons in society are the
people who often silence people when they speak out for stricter laws; if
needed with the threat of their gun. And thus, speaking out on social media may be dangerous if supporters of the NRA are in power and they fear they may lose influence and power but also the legal use of their toys.
Comments