(12j) Storm over Philippines: warning to all of us?
The Philippines, the country suffered a lot, last month from an earthquake and this weekend from a storm
that killed maybe up to or even more than 12,000 people and destroyed
many houses, it seems even whole cities while large boats were thrown on land.
There are now reports of looting and I heard the army will
be used to stop them. The people roaming the streets and breaking into houses are condemned but I wonder what we would
do if our houses were destroyed, including our food we stored for winter
and all our crops in the fields? Would we not start looting damaged
houses and shops, certainly money has become useless and all
vegetation is destroyed? Of course, when people start stealing
televisions and radios then they should be stopped but I think most
people will start 'stealing' food to stay alive. When the army will prevent people taking food out of shops,
maybe even shoot some, then I wonder how many people may die while food
is rotting unused in shops. And thus the army should do as much as possible to bring food and water although it will be difficult as many roads and airports are destroyed. And in the meanwhile, another although less severe storm is developing that may hit the Philippines again.
As I mentioned in an earlier article, I wonder how much
preparations governments are taking to be sure there will be food when
disasters struck their country? Many governments probably still deny
climate change is happening now, or they may use it as an excuse to earn
even more from selling products that will increase the problems such as
start fracking, claiming it is better than burning coals while using
both. Or they will build more nuclear power stations while Fukushima proved that when nature destroys, even a wall of 10 metres high is not enough
to prevent destruction. But of course, the West build so much better.
People start saying we should start building more water
defences against rising sea levels but I wonder whether that will be a good idea. As the storm in the Philippines showed
us, severe storms can swipe up the waters. What if water manages to go over wall defences? The water wouldn't be able to retract for a long period. That
doesn't mean we can't think about solutions, certainly those to reduce further problems.
In addition, during these storms and heavy rains, there can
be landslides, breaking gas pipes and thus releasing gas, therefore raising the possibility of
large fires, certainly in major cities.
Therefore, let us hope governments at the climate
conference in Poland (what a coincidence the storm happened the same weekend while the weekend before a storm battered Europe) will accept actions are needed (even when there may never be proof the severe storm is the direct result of climate change) to have more
renewable energy and that does not include growing trees to burn them (some claim this is renewable energy)
but it means insulation in houses, sun and wind energy close to cities and on top of houses of people (will also reduce energy bills but also air pollution). And it means accepting our responsibilities, not blaming animals as some do so we can wash our hands in water and continue as if we are not involved.
But when I read that for instance the British government employs a gas industry employee to draft UK's energy policy at Decca (Department of Energy and
Climate Change) or had many more meetings with people from energy firms than
those from green campaign groups then I fear the worst. Idem in Russia where
people were arrested because they protested against future exploitation of
Arctic while a number of countries have already reduced subsidies for green energy while others may follow.
The New Scientist (9 November 2013, Editorial) describes how people are already changing their
behaviour, mainly at a local level, because they start feeling or fearing the effects of climate change. They reduce emissions by insulation houses and using energy-efficient light bulbs and
this has an impact on emissions. Let us hope governments will not
force us to reduce our efforts to reduce energy use by forcing us to buy
polluting energies so those companies can make even more profits, in
the name of more economic growth. Because then one day we may have
nothing left when a similar storm as the one in the Philippines destroys
Western buildings and economies while killing people here. But as the
climate top is sponsored by ArcelorMittal and the Emirates (and car companies although this may be sincere if they invest in the development of energy-efficient cars) and the organiser
want to convince people that the use of coal in Poland will remain for another long
time, we can fear the worse.
I am not sure I will write another major article concerning climate change as I only gets the information from the experts. They too warn people and politicians and have much more details than I have although maybe they are slightly too cautious in possible scenarios. I already mentioned what I think are solutions such as solar panels on houses and cars but also wind energy and energy-efficient light bulbs. In another article I may describe better how I think cities can be changed and developed in order to reduce our energy use as well as our energy bills. And many of these methods are already used although not enough yet, thus what Iwill describe will not be something new.
Comments